Each statement can be matched to an appropriate rock type:

• Banded iron formations (BIFs)…appeared during the Archean and early Proterozoic eons. They suggest that the Earth's early atmosphere contained hardly any oxygen while parts of the oceans may have been oxygenated.
• Uraninite-bearing conglomerates… limited to the Archean, and could not have formed if rivers carrying such pebbles had been in contact with an oxygenated atmosphere.
• Red beds… become abundant during the early to middle part of the Proterozoic eon and it contains iron in a form which suggests that the level of atmospheric oxygen had risen significantly since Archean time.
• Trypania-bearing shales… typically form in calm offshore waters but this particular example contains a euharyotic fossil of Precambrian age. (Stromatolitic limestones contain layered trace fossils and cellular filaments from cyanobacterial mats, which are prokaryotic organisms.)
• Tillites…occur sporadically throughout Earth's history and formed when glaciers carried rocks from continents an dropped them into deep waters.
• Stromatolitic limestone (nearshore sandstones was also accepted) contains trace fossils, and is re more likely to be found in a Precambrian thrust-and-fold belt than in an Archean greenstone belt.
• Volcanic ash beds… likely to include minerals that contain radioactive elements and their daughter elements which will yield a reliable absolute age. (Only partial marks were given for uraninite-bearing conglomerates… Although uraninite contains uranium and, therefore, can be dated, the uraninite is eroded from sources that could be of several different ages. Dating uraninite pebbles gives the age of their igneous source(s), rather than the age of its deposition as part of the conglomerate.)
• Nearshore sandstone… is common in the stratigraphic record after Archean time, but it rarely contains well-preserved fossils.

• the paleomagnetism preserved in certain igneous and sedimentary rocks provides information about the latitudes at which they acquired their magnetism in the past
• structures (igneous and metamorphic belts, or thrust and fold belts) indicating mountain building zones (orogenies) having similar age, but found on separate continents,  may indicate that they were once sutured into a single larger continent.
• the transition from a passive margin to mountain building zones produce characteristic sequences of sedimentary rocks. Therefore, another kind of evidence is similarity in the sequences of sedimentary rocks found near the edge of ancient cratons. (One student mentioned occurrence of marker beds such as a volcanic ash bed, which could also be very useful evidence that some areas were once joined together...)
• common genera or species of fossils on continents that are now separated (note: different fossils found in "exotic terranes" are the complement of this kind of evidence, but I did not accept it as a different kind of evidence)
• radiometric dating of igneous rocks (volcanic lavas or ash beds) found below and above sedimentary rocks, is often needed to prove the similar age of sedimentary rocks that may contain few fossils but show very similar sequences of rock types on separate continents (and might have been derived from a mountain belt formed when these continents were sutured into a supercontinent).

• reverse greenhouse effect caused by a drop in the level of atmospheric CO₂. A suggested cause is a period of increased productivity of organic matter combined with its fast burial rate in sediments (preventing its decomposition to release CO₂ back to the atmosphere);
• the movement of large landmasses towards higher latitudes, closer to either the North or South pole… because the accumulation of snow on land reflects back solar radiation and further cools the climate;
• cycles of long duration where the intensity of solar radiation reaching the Earth decreases just enough to prevent the melting of snow during summers at higher latitudes.

Dating evidence (such as tillites or striations on continental rocks) does not confirm that these features were produced by an ice age. A proper answer must be a type of isotopic signal which is directly influenced by processes taking place during an ice age. The best answer was the proportions of stable isotopes of oxygen (O¹⁸ /O¹⁶) which can be analyzed from fossil marine CaCO₃ shells (such as brachiopods). The reason? Marine shells record proportions of oxygen isotopes left in the sea during the growth of ice caps. Ice caps tend to draw O¹⁶ in greater proportions than its average concentration in seawater because this lighter isotope evaporates faster from tropical waters than O¹⁸ and doesn't condense (and rain down) as fast as O¹⁸. The water reaching higher latitudes is therefore getting poorer in   O¹⁸. Credit was also given for answering with the stable isotopes of carbon, i.e. C ¹³/C ¹² from marine CaCO₃ shells These isotopes record a possible side effect of an ice age, i.e. the increased weathering of organic matter (which has lower C ¹³/C ¹² proportions than average C) that was buried in sediments earlier, but is exposed to weathering and decomposition because sea level dropped while ice caps grew. Note that C¹⁴ is a radioactive isotope, used for dating relatively young events.

3.a) Characteristics of greenstone belts in Abitibi:
    i) graywackes and shales
    iii) belts of relatively small width
    iv) altered volcanic rocks that were originally ultramafic in composition
    vi) association with gold and other metallic ore deposits that are mined today
    vii) found along the margin of small felsic cratons

Characteristics of thrust-and-fold belts:
    ii) marine sedimentary rocks deposited in shallow-water environments
    v) wide igneous belt bordered by a metamorphic zone
    vii) broad sheets of sedimentary rocks thrust over large cratons

b) The high heat flow during the Archean eon kept the crust relatively thin and mostly mafic, and convection during the mantle was more intense than later on. As a result, cratons were kept small because they rifted (i.e. broke up) more often. The subduction of oceanic crust led to collisions of small cratons between which were trapped narrow belts of ultramafic volcanic rocks and sedimentary rocks. Sedimentary rocks like graywackes and shales accumulated because material eroded from continental rocks was not accumulating on broad edge of large cratons, where it would have been subjected to intense wave action. In contrast, thrust-and fold belts contain thick sheets of sandstones and limestones belts which formed on broad shallow-water continental platforms. Sitting on cooler crust, they broke up into large thick sheets that were pushed on the edge of large cratons.

4. a) Ediacaran (same as Precambrian Vendian fauna) fauna shows:
    i) absence of mineralized hard parts
    ii) preservation in sandstone

The earliest Paleozoic fauna (small shelly fossils, Tommotian and Burgess Shale faunas) show:
    iii) body plans including limbs and mouths (not found in Ediacaran fossils)
    iv) evidence of complex burrowing behaviour (Ediacaran-age sediments show far less burrows and they tend to be simple resting traces rather than complex feeding traces)
    v) preservation in limestone and shales
    vi) scarcity of stromatolitic limestone (presumably because grazers can now feed on cyanobacterial mats)
    vii) diverse ecological roles
    viii) mineralized hard parts that covered most of the body

b) You were asked to justify your answer by using what you had just sorted out in two categories… You could illustrate progress from simpler to more complex forms of life by pointing out the decline of fossils left by prokaryotes (vi) , the increasingly complex behaviour of animals larger than unicellular eukaryotes suggested by (iv) and (vii), the evolution of complex body plans including mouth and limbs (iii) and mineralized hard parts (viii). The only element suggesting that the Ediacaran fauna produced innovations that left no descendants is the unusual preservation of Ediacaran fossils (in sandstones rather than in limestone or shale). This was interpreted by some as a sign that Ediacaran animals were covered by a tough membrane, unlike the soft-bodied organisms that were preserved in the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale.

5. a) an unconformity is evidence of erosion or non-deposition: it cannot be a sedimentary formation. Evidence of an unconformity therefore appears at the contact between formations. An unconformity could be detected within a sedimentary rock formation if the formation clearly contained an incomplete succession of fossils from its bottom to its top. The best answer was "between I and II in the first section and/or "between I and IV" in the second section. The most convincing evidence was the change in the orientation of layering (not horizontal in formation I, but horizontal in formation IV) which suggested that formation I was deposited, then tilted (by movement along a fault during extension or compression of the crust) before sedimentation started again. The sharp change in type of sediment and type of fossils between units I and II also suggested an unconformity.

b) Formation VI crosscuts formations I to V because it is an igneous intrusion (you were told that it is datable and unfossiliferous, and the symbol does not correspond to any of the sedimentary rock types given in the legend). An intrusion can only penetrate through formations that are already laid down, so its age is younger than any of the formations that are crosscut.

c) Formations II and IV both contain the datable formation labelled "III" at both sites because its age is identical at both locations. Therefore, formations II and IV could be about the same age (at least right below and above the marker bed III). They consist of different rock types, however, which indicate different environment of depositions. Sandstone generally accumulates in nearshore marine environments with energetic wave action while shale accumulated in calmer, deeper water. Their different fossils probably also have different environmental requirements during life.

d) A correlation is some kind of equivalence established between rocks that are geographically separated. Lithologic correlation could be done here on the basis of similar rock type (limestone); this amounts to an interpretation that these two limestones, found at widely separated locations, accumulated under similar environmental conditions. Stratigraphic or temporal correlation, done on the basis of similar index fossils, is an interpretation that both limestones were deposited during the same interval of time and likely from the same body of water. Nautiloids, being swimming predators, are likely to be good index fossils, i.e. geographically widespread, including genera and species easy to identify and which appeared for relatively short intervals in the fossil record.